Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6522

ROBERT EARL VANCE,


Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NFN IRBY, Officer; NFN RHODES, Sergeant; J.
WILLIAMS, Sergeant; OFFICER MCDANIEL,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(CA-03-3826-8-27)

Submitted:

August 22, 2005

Decided:

December 7, 2005

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Earl Vance, Appellant Pro Se. William Benson Darwin, Jr.,
Ginger Dee Goforth, HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, P.A.,
Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
Robert Earl Vance appeals the district courts order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.


No. CA-03-3826-8-27 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2005).

We have reviewed

See Vance v. Irby,

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

You might also like