Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Thompson v. Abraham, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Randolph Thompson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Doctor Abraham and P.H.S. Medical Service in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's reasons for denying Thompson's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-05-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6295

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Randolph Thompson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Doctor Abraham and P.H.S. Medical Service in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's reasons for denying Thompson's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Thompson v. Abraham, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Randolph Thompson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Doctor Abraham and P.H.S. Medical Service in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's reasons for denying Thompson's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6295

    RANDOLPH THOMPSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR ABRAHAM; P.H.S. MEDICAL SERVICE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:06-cv-03432-RDB)

    Submitted:

    May 10, 2007

    Decided:

    May 15, 2007

    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Randolph Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Randolph Thompson appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Thompson v.

    Abraham, No. 1:06-cv-03432-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 5, 2007).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like