Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Scinto v. Preston, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    20 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Paul Scinto, Sr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its May 28 and December 11, 2009 orders. The Court also granted Scinto's motion to exceed the page limit for his informal brief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-08-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6058

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Paul Scinto, Sr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its May 28 and December 11, 2009 orders. The Court also granted Scinto's motion to exceed the page limit for his informal brief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    20 views2 pages

    Scinto v. Preston, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Paul Scinto, Sr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its May 28 and December 11, 2009 orders. The Court also granted Scinto's motion to exceed the page limit for his informal brief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6058

    PAUL SCINTO, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    EDWARD GLENN PRESTON; RALPH MELTON, JR.; FRANK POLUMBO; ERIC
    WING; THE CITY OF NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA; ESTATE OF BRIAN
    LEMAY,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    E&J AUTOMOTIVE, et al.; BRIAN LEMAY,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Greenville.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (4:03-cv-00178-H)

    Submitted:

    July 20, 2010

    Decided:

    August 12, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Paul Scinto, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James Carlton Thornton,


    PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; W.
    Walton Kitchin, Jr., COLOMBO, KITCHIN, JOHNSON, DUNN & BALL,
    LLP, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul Scinto, Sr., appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Scinto v. Preston, No. 4:03-cv-00178-H (E.D.N.C. May 28

    & Dec. 11, 2009).


    limitations

    for

    his

    We grant Scintos motion to exceed length


    informal

    brief.

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like