Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Irvin Catlett, Jr. v. County of Worcester, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Irvin Hannis Catlett Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Worcester County and a sergeant. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Irvin Catlett, Jr. v. County of Worcester, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views3 pages
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Irvin Hannis Catlett Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Worcester County and a sergeant. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the lower court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-05-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7689

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Irvin Hannis Catlett Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Worcester County and a sergeant. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views3 pages

    Irvin Catlett, Jr. v. County of Worcester, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Irvin Hannis Catlett Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Worcester County and a sergeant. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7689

    IRVIN HANNIS CATLETT, JR.,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    COUNTY OF WORCESTER; PHILLIP FORT, Sgt.,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    STATE OF MARYLAND; JOEL TODD, States Attorney,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
    Judge. (8:11-cv-00162-PJM)

    Submitted:

    May 24, 2012

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    DAVIS,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    May 30, 2012

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Irvin Hannis Catlett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Francis


    Breads, Jr., Hanover, Maryland; Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE
    OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Irvin

    Hannis

    Catlett

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Catlett

    v.

    Nov. 29, 2011).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We

    Worcester,
    dispense

    contentions
    the

    court

    No.
    with

    8:11-cv-00162-PJM
    oral

    argument

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    (D.

    Md.

    because

    the

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like