Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Draft On Self-Control
Draft On Self-Control
Draft On Self-Control
Self-control and its influence on generations, actual society and the self
Nicolas Cerquera Angarita
LDS Business College
SELF-CONTROL
SELF-CONTROL
Socrates mentioned that most of the reasons a person acts not according to his own
beliefs or a societys moral code is because he or she considers that the pleasure that he or she
will get from an action not according with these standards will give more pleasure than holding
with these standards. The same applies when a person is unable to endure accomplishing certain
goals. The pleasure of doing something against that goal will be more rewarding, in the persons
perspective, than if they stuck with the long term goal. This is well supported in various studies
like The behavioral economics of will in recovery from addiction, in which it is stated that the
behavior of self-control is like a hyperbola. This means that when the reward is near the
accomplishing time, the value assigned to it is higher. When two rewards with different
achieving times are compared, the lower-time lower-value reward will in some point exceed the
value of the longer-time longer-value reward and this can explain why people with low selfcontrol prefer short time rewards rather the longer but more substantial rewards (Stojek, Fischer
& Mackillop, 2015).
Socrates provided a clearer example. Two objects that are at the same distance from us
and with the same size will seem to have the same worth to us (if the value is determined by
size). But if we compare two objects with different sizes at the same distance, it is clear what
object we will choose. Sometimes the smaller object could be closer to us, making it look bigger
than the bigger object that is at a longer distance away from us. Obviously, this perspective will
make us see the smaller object as the bigger of the two objects we can see (Gosling, 2003).
According to this example, one of the variables that can affect self-control is the
knowledge the person has on the subject. If the self-control is based on personal beliefs we can
say he is being self-controlled since he is acting according to what he thinks is right or worthy.
SELF-CONTROL
But if the self-control is based on a social moral code, it could be that his actions are not aligned
with societys moral code and therefore he is not exercising this value. Since a community moral
code is based on the principle of helping the peaceful interaction of different individuals, and
therefore to ensure the pleasure of more individuals, we can say that self-control based on moral
codes is more important these days than the self-control based on personal values.
Self-control is affected by a wide variety of factors. The two types of self-control, as well
as the natural need of human interaction, can give us some hints. Most of self-control is affected
by social interactions. The environment in which we are raised and the people we are with
influence us to adopt a certain type of behavior. The study published in Self-control and jail
inmates' substance misuse post-release: mediation by friends' substance use and moderation by
age, shows that people released from jail that associate with people that abuse drugs were more
likely to abuse the same substance and to experiment with more harmful substances as well
(Malouf, Schaefer, Witt, Moore, Stuewig & Tangney, 2013).
A perfect example to illustrate how the lack of self-control can affect generations, and
even a whole nation, is Adolf Hitler. He was raised in Austria near the border of Germany.
Because of the similarities of both nations, the desire of unifying those nations started. With the
help of some strong nationalist teachers at his school, the rough life in Vienna and the defeat of
Germany in the First World War, the future of Adolf Hitler was decided. He would spend the rest
of his life in politics and help Germany regain its lost glory. Some aspects of his life that are
important to highlight could be found in the descriptions that a teacher gave of Hitler when he
was young:
SELF-CONTROL
Hitler was certainly gifted, although only for particular subjects, but he lacked
self-control and, to say the least, he was considered argumentative, autocratic,
self-opinionated and bad-tempered, and unable to submit to school discipline. Nor
was he industrious; otherwise he would have achieved much better results, gifted
as he was (Shirer, 1990, p. 12).
This lack of self-control was not only part of his early years of existence but also an
important trait in his life. He started to get help from a wide variety of people, including
perverted homosexuals, resented criminals and people with deep hate for the government. He
spread propaganda and ideas throughout the country about anti-Semitism and the belief of a
superior race (Shirer, 1990, pp. 19-23). This was in opposition to the welfare of the whole nation
since a big part of it were Jews and different races, totally against the benefit of a lot of people. If
we analyze this, we can say that if self-control is based on personal beliefs, Hitler was
outstanding since he struggled in a lot of different ways and was imprisoned because of his acts
and thoughts. But if self-control is based on a moral code perspective, he was definitely wrong.
The consequence of this person lacking so crucial of a value, is evident as history can
show. There were six million Jews killed in concentration camps and sixty to seventy million
human casualties because of the conflict known as World War Two. This was a conflict that was
provoked by the hate of one single person that was transmitted to a nation. These are the
numbers by which Adolf Hitler will be remembered forever. Because of this war many traditions
were formed, the courses of nations were changed and entire lives and generations were touched
for the rest of their existence.
SELF-CONTROL
SELF-CONTROL
Baumeister, R. Vohs, K. Tice, D. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions
on Psychological Science, 16(6), 351-55. Retrieved from:
http://cdp.sagepub.com/content/16/6/351.full.pdf+html