Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Davis v. United States, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant, the United States, in a case brought by Stanley Harvey Davis under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court also granted Davis' motion to present additional information.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Davis v. United States, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant, the United States, in a case brought by Stanley Harvey Davis under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court also granted Davis' motion to present additional information.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-05-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7657

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant, the United States, in a case brought by Stanley Harvey Davis under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court also granted Davis' motion to present additional information.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Davis v. United States, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant, the United States, in a case brought by Stanley Harvey Davis under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court also granted Davis' motion to present additional information.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7657

    STANLEY HARVEY DAVIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
    District Judge. (5:05-ct-00718)

    Submitted:

    April 9, 2007

    Decided:

    May 7, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stanley Harvey Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Michelle T. Fuseyamore, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Stanley Harvey Davis appeals the district courts order
    granting

    summary

    judgment

    to

    Defendant

    and

    dismissing

    complaint brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Davis
    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Davis v.

    United States, No. 5:05-ct-00718 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2006).

    We

    grant Davis motion for leave to present additional information.


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like