Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Darrell Williams v. Anthony Padula, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Darrell J. Williams on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its October 21, 2011 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Darrell Williams v. Anthony Padula, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Darrell J. Williams on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its October 21, 2011 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-04-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7547

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Darrell J. Williams on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its October 21, 2011 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Darrell Williams v. Anthony Padula, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Darrell J. Williams on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its October 21, 2011 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 11-7547
    DARRELL J. WILLIAMS, f/k/a Alvin Glenn,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ANTHONY J. PADULA; GERALDINE MIRO, Deputy Directed Programs,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (2:10-cv-02707-CMC)
    Submitted:

    April 19, 2012

    Decided:

    April 24, 2012

    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Darrell J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III,
    AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Darrell J. Williams appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we

    affirm

    Williams
    2011).
    legal
    before

    v.

    for

    the

    reasons

    Padula,

    No.

    stated

    by

    the

    2:10-cv-02707-CMC

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    district
    (D.S.C.

    court.

    Oct.

    21,

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like