Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Segers v. US Dept Veterans, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    1) Truitt Segers filed an action against the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs that was dismissed by the district court for lack of jurisdiction. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that the court did not have jurisdiction over the case. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-03-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-2477

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Truitt Segers filed an action against the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs that was dismissed by the district court for lack of jurisdiction. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that the court did not have jurisdiction over the case. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Segers v. US Dept Veterans, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Truitt Segers filed an action against the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs that was dismissed by the district court for lack of jurisdiction. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning that the court did not have jurisdiction over the case. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-2477

    TRUITT A. SEGERS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CA-94-657-6)
    Submitted:

    October 3, 1995

    Decided:

    March 21, 1996

    Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit


    Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Truitt A. Segers, Appellant Pro Se.
    John Warren Stone, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
    his action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Segers v. United States Dep't of Veterans Affairs, No. CA-94-657-6
    (M.D.N.C. July 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like