Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jones v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Nathaniel Jones' appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the three-judge panel reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors. The appeals court denied Jones a certificate of probable cause to appeal and also denied a certificate of appealability. The appeal was dismissed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous denial of Jones' habeas petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-01-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6352

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Nathaniel Jones' appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the three-judge panel reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors. The appeals court denied Jones a certificate of probable cause to appeal and also denied a certificate of appealability. The appeal was dismissed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous denial of Jones' habeas petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    Jones v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Nathaniel Jones' appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. In a per curiam opinion, the three-judge panel reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors. The appeals court denied Jones a certificate of probable cause to appeal and also denied a certificate of appealability. The appeal was dismissed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous denial of Jones' habeas petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6352

    NATHANIEL JONES,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
    Judge. (CA-95-793-AM)
    Submitted:

    January 23, 1997

    Decided:

    January 31, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Nathaniel Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1994), amended
    by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.
    No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent
    that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a
    certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. Jones v. Angelone, No. CA-95-793-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 1996).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like