Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Blackwell v. Vanyur, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    Timothy Blackwell filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Blackwell appealed the denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-03-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7724

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Timothy Blackwell filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Blackwell appealed the denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    Blackwell v. Vanyur, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Timothy Blackwell filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which was denied by the district court. Blackwell appealed the denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7724

    TIMOTHY JAY BLACKWELL,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    J. M. VANYUR, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
    (CA-97-256)
    Submitted:

    March 12, 1998

    Decided:

    March 26, 1998

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Timothy Jay Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of
    the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Blackwell v. Vanyur,
    No. CA-97-256 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like