Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Cherisson V., 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Raymond Cherisson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his Rule 60(b) motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had denied Cherisson's Rule 60(b) motion on November 5, 2002. Therefore, because the district court had recently decided the case, the Fourth Circuit denied the mandamus petition as moot.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-12-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7289

    Original Title

    In Re: Cherisson v., 4th Cir. (2002)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Raymond Cherisson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his Rule 60(b) motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had denied Cherisson's Rule 60(b) motion on November 5, 2002. Therefore, because the district court had recently decided the case, the Fourth Circuit denied the mandamus petition as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    In Re: Cherisson V., 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Raymond Cherisson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his Rule 60(b) motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had denied Cherisson's Rule 60(b) motion on November 5, 2002. Therefore, because the district court had recently decided the case, the Fourth Circuit denied the mandamus petition as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7289

    In Re:

    RAYMOND CHERISSON,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    November 21, 2002

    (CR-94-97)

    Decided:

    December 13, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Raymond Cherisson, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Raymond Cherisson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
    the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. 60(b)
    motion.

    He seeks an order from this court directing the district

    court to act.

    Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the

    district court entered an order denying Cherissons Rule 60(b)


    motion on November 5, 2002. Accordingly, because the district court
    has recently decided Cherissons case, we grant leave to proceed in
    forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like