Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    In Re: Michael McRae V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying Michael McRae's petition for a writ of mandamus. McRae had alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 2012 motion challenging his sentence. However, the Court of Appeals notes that the district court recently denied McRae's motion in October 2013, so his mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, the Court denies the petition and dispenses with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    In Re: Michael McRae V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying Michael McRae's petition for a writ of mandamus. McRae had alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 2012 motion challenging his sentence. However, the Court of Appeals notes that the district court recently denied McRae's motion in October 2013, so his mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, the Court denies the petition and dispenses with oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-11-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-2222

    Original Title

    In Re: Michael McRae v., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying Michael McRae's petition for a writ of mandamus. McRae had alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 2012 motion challenging his sentence. However, the Court of Appeals notes that the district court recently denied McRae's motion in October 2013, so his mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, the Court denies the petition and dispenses with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    In Re: Michael McRae V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying Michael McRae's petition for a writ of mandamus. McRae had alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 2012 motion challenging his sentence. However, the Court of Appeals notes that the district court recently denied McRae's motion in October 2013, so his mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, the Court denies the petition and dispenses with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-2222

    In Re: MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (5:97-cr-00094-H-6)

    Submitted:

    October 17, 2013

    Decided:

    November 6, 2013

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Scott McRae, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Scott McRae petitions for a writ of mandamus,
    alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on
    his

    June

    26,

    Jurisdictional

    2012

    Motion

    Error.

    He

    to

    Discontinue

    seeks

    an

    directing the district court to act.

    order

    Sentence

    from

    this

    from
    court

    Our review of the district

    courts docket reveals that the district court denied McRaes


    motion

    by

    order

    entered

    on

    October

    15,

    2013.

    Accordingly,

    because the district court has recently denied McRaes motion,


    we

    grant

    mandamus

    leave

    to

    petition

    proceed

    as

    moot.

    in
    We

    forma

    pauperis

    dispense

    with

    and
    oral

    deny

    the

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like