Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Lewis, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Elan Christopher Lewis's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Lewis, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Elan Christopher Lewis's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-12-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7141

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Elan Christopher Lewis's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Lewis, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of Elan Christopher Lewis's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7141

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ELAN CHRISTOPHER LEWIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (3:94-cr-00094-RLW-1)

    Submitted:

    December 10, 2008

    Decided:

    December 23, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Elan Christopher Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas Maguire,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Elan

    Christopher

    Lewis

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to


    18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    United States v. Lewis,

    No. 3:94-cr-00094-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. June 20, 2008).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like