Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    Eustace Brown appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Brown's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's denial of Brown's § 2255 motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-07-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6308

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Eustace Brown appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Brown's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's denial of Brown's § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eustace Brown appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Brown's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's denial of Brown's § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6308

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EUSTACE BROWN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District
    Judge. (CR-94-52, CA-99-20-3)

    Submitted:

    July 13, 2000

    Decided:

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Eustace Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Eustace Brown seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-94-52; CA-99-20-3
    (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 14, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like