Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cargill v. United States, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Frederick Anthony Cargill appealed the district court's dismissal of his motion for a writ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision. Cargill was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The appeals court affirmed the district court's dismissal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-09-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6084

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frederick Anthony Cargill appealed the district court's dismissal of his motion for a writ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision. Cargill was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The appeals court affirmed the district court's dismissal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Cargill v. United States, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frederick Anthony Cargill appealed the district court's dismissal of his motion for a writ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision. Cargill was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented. The appeals court affirmed the district court's dismissal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6084

    FREDERICK ANTHONY CARGILL,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (1:09-cv-00861-JAB-PTS)

    Submitted:

    August 6, 2010

    Decided:

    September 10, 2010

    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Frederick Anthony Cargill, Appellant Pro Se.


    Angela Hewlett
    Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Frederick Anthony Cargill appeals the district courts
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    dismissing his motion for a writ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651(a)
    (2006).
    error.
    district

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
    court.

    00861-JAB-PTS
    proceed

    in

    See

    Cargill

    (M.D.N.C.

    forma

    Dec.

    pauperis.

    v.

    United

    States,

    30,

    2009).

    We

    dispense

    with

    We

    No.

    grant
    oral

    1:09-cvleave

    to

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like