Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Joseph Monroe, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joseph Edwards Monroe's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and additional argument would not aid the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-09-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7214

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joseph Edwards Monroe's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and additional argument would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Joseph Monroe, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joseph Edwards Monroe's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and additional argument would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7214

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOSEPH EDWARDS MONROE, a/k/a Slim,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.
    Norman K. Moon,
    Senior District Judge. (3:94-cr-00041-NKM-BWC-4)

    Submitted:

    September 11, 2012

    Decided:

    September 14, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joseph Edwards Monroe, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Joseph

    Edwards

    Monroe

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion.

    We have

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United

    States v. Monroe, No. 3:94-cr-00041-NKM-BWC-4 (W.D. Va. July 9,


    2012).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like