Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Brown v. Hampton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Robert Earl Brown under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court of Appeals denied Brown's motion for appointment of counsel, denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismissed the appeal. In doing so, the court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied relief on Brown's § 2254 petition after reviewing the record and a magistrate judge's recommendation.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7042

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Robert Earl Brown under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court of Appeals denied Brown's motion for appointment of counsel, denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismissed the appeal. In doing so, the court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied relief on Brown's § 2254 petition after reviewing the record and a magistrate judge's recommendation.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Brown v. Hampton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Robert Earl Brown under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court of Appeals denied Brown's motion for appointment of counsel, denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismissed the appeal. In doing so, the court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied relief on Brown's § 2254 petition after reviewing the record and a magistrate judge's recommendation.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7042

    ROBERT EARL BROWN,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    GEORGE HAMPTON, Warden; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK,
    Attorney General of the State of South
    Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (CA-94-1113-18AJ)
    Submitted:

    April 15, 1996

    Decided:

    April 23, 1996

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
    Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel,
    deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the
    appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Hampton,
    No. CA-94-1113-18AJ (D.S.C. May 30, 1995). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like