Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bell v. Harrison, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Alexander Bell in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7302

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Alexander Bell in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Bell v. Harrison, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Alexander Bell in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7302

    ALEXANDER BELL, a/k/a Sulyaman Al Islam Salaam,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RICKIE HARRISON; JAMES L. HARVEY; PARKER EVATT,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-93-1017-3-3-BD)
    Submitted:

    April 15, 1996

    Decided:

    April 23, 1996

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Alexander Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas McKay, Jr., Daniel Roy
    Settana, Jr., MCKAY, MCKAY, HENRY & FOSTER, P.A., Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
    judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bell v. Harrison,
    No. CA-93-1017-3-3-BD (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like