Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Benjamin Johnson filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against the Commonwealth of Virginia which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. Johnson appealed the dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its ruling. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Benjamin Johnson filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against the Commonwealth of Virginia which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. Johnson appealed the dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its ruling. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in existing court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-09-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1799

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Benjamin Johnson filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against the Commonwealth of Virginia which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. Johnson appealed the dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its ruling. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Benjamin Johnson filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against the Commonwealth of Virginia which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. Johnson appealed the dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its ruling. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1799

    BENJAMIN JOHNSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (2:09-cv-00186-HCM-TEM)

    Submitted:

    Before

    September 10, 2009

    Decided:

    September 14, 2009

    KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Benjamin Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Benjamin

    Johnson

    appeals
    his

    42

    district
    U.S.C.

    courts
    1983

    order

    dismissing

    without

    complaint.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    error.

    prejudice

    the

    (2006)

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Johnson v. Virginia, No. 2:09-cv-00186-HCM-TEM

    (E.D. Va. filed June 15, 2009; entered June 16, 2009).
    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like