Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Foster v. Coakley, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Foster's petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. Foster, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Therefore, the Court affirmed the district court's denial of Foster's petition for the reasons stated in Foster v. Coakley, No. 1:10-cv-00961-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 31, 2010).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Foster v. Coakley, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Foster's petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. Foster, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Therefore, the Court affirmed the district court's denial of Foster's petition for the reasons stated in Foster v. Coakley, No. 1:10-cv-00961-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 31, 2010).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-05-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7532

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Foster's petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. Foster, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Therefore, the Court affirmed the district court's denial of Foster's petition for the reasons stated in Foster v. Coakley, No. 1:10-cv-00961-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 31, 2010).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Foster v. Coakley, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Foster's petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. Foster, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Therefore, the Court affirmed the district court's denial of Foster's petition for the reasons stated in Foster v. Coakley, No. 1:10-cv-00961-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 31, 2010).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7532

    KEVIN FOSTER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    J. COAKLEY, Acting Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
    (1:10-cv-00961-CCB)

    Submitted:

    April 28, 2011

    Decided:

    May 2, 2011

    Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin Foster, Appellant Pro Se.


    Alex Gordon, Assistant United
    States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin Foster, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241 (West
    2006 & Supp. 2010) petition.
    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    reasons stated by the district court.


    1:10-cv-00961-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 31, 2010).

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    Foster v. Coakley, No.


    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like