Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Clark, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael A. Clark's motion for reduction of sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court also denied Clark's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-05-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7560

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael A. Clark's motion for reduction of sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court also denied Clark's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    United States v. Clark, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael A. Clark's motion for reduction of sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court also denied Clark's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7560

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL A. CLARK,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:00-cr-00244-REP-1)

    Submitted:

    April 28, 2011

    Decided:

    May 2, 2011

    Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael A. Clark, Appellant Pro Se.


    Richard Daniel Cooke,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael A. Clark appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    States

    v.

    2010).
    dispense

    Clark,

    No.

    3:00-cr-00244-REP-1

    (E.D.

    Va.

    United

    Oct.

    12,

    We deny Clarks motion for appointment of counsel and


    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like