Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Jerrell Antonio Thomas, A/K/A Baby Huey, 110 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes the denial of Jerrell Antonio Thomas's petition for disclosure of a signed grand jury concurrence form. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling to deny the petition. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Jerrell Antonio Thomas, A/K/A Baby Huey, 110 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes the denial of Jerrell Antonio Thomas's petition for disclosure of a signed grand jury concurrence form. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling to deny the petition. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-04-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 110 F.3d 61 Docket: 96-7421

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes the denial of Jerrell Antonio Thomas's petition for disclosure of a signed grand jury concurrence form. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling to deny the petition. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views1 page

    United States v. Jerrell Antonio Thomas, A/K/A Baby Huey, 110 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes the denial of Jerrell Antonio Thomas's petition for disclosure of a signed grand jury concurrence form. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling to deny the petition. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    110 F.

    3d 61

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Jerrell Antonio THOMAS, a/k/a Baby Huey, DefendantAppellant.
    No. 96-7421.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 27, 1997.
    Decided April 3, 1997.

    Jerrell Antonio Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.


    Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's Petition for
    Disclosure of Signed Grand Jury Concurrence Form. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas, No.
    CR-94-69 (E.D.Va. July 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like