UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1793

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOUGLAS GANSLER; WILLIAM F. BROCKMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:12-cv-01466-JFM)

Submitted:

October 11, 2012

Decided:

October 15, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:
Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district courts
order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint
and denying her subsequent motion for reconsideration.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

affirm

for

the

reasons

24, 2012, June 11, 2012).

expedite.

before

by

Accordingly,
the

district

Randolph v. Gansler, No. 1:12-cv-01466-JFM (D. Md. May

court.

legal

stated

We have

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

We deny as moot Randolphs motion to

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED