Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mixon v. Mixon, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding two cases brought by James P. Mixon, Jr. against Cheryl T. Mixon, Ruth N. Murphy, and Fred Murphy. The district court had dismissed Mixon's complaints as frivolous. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Court of Appeals also denied Mixon's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-05-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-1203

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding two cases brought by James P. Mixon, Jr. against Cheryl T. Mixon, Ruth N. Murphy, and Fred Murphy. The district court had dismissed Mixon's complaints as frivolous. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Court of Appeals also denied Mixon's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Mixon v. Mixon, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding two cases brought by James P. Mixon, Jr. against Cheryl T. Mixon, Ruth N. Murphy, and Fred Murphy. The district court had dismissed Mixon's complaints as frivolous. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Court of Appeals also denied Mixon's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-1203

    JAMES P. MIXON, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CHERYL T. MIXON; RUTH N. MURPHY; FRED MURPHY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-97-136-2, CA-97-137-2)
    Submitted:

    May 1, 1997

    Decided:

    May 8, 1997

    Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    James P. Mixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
    complaints as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mixon v. Mixon, Nos.
    CA-97-136-2; CA-97-137-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 4, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like