Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Kennon, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    1) Glenn Williams, a North Carolina inmate, filed a Section 1983 complaint against Brad Kennon which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. 2) Williams appealed the district court's denial. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal frivolous. 3) The Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the Section 1983 complaint. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-06-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6957

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Glenn Williams, a North Carolina inmate, filed a Section 1983 complaint against Brad Kennon which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. 2) Williams appealed the district court's denial. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal frivolous. 3) The Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the Section 1983 complaint. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Williams v. Kennon, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Glenn Williams, a North Carolina inmate, filed a Section 1983 complaint against Brad Kennon which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. 2) Williams appealed the district court's denial. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal frivolous. 3) The Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the Section 1983 complaint. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 96-6957

    GLENN L. WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BRAD L. KENNON,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-96-208-5-H)
    Submitted:

    June 19, 1997

    Decided:

    June 26, 1997

    Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Glenn L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district
    court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that
    this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Kennon, No. CA-96-2085-H (E.D.N.C. June 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like