Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Adams, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Charles Jerome Adams appealed the district court's denial of his motion for an extension of time to file a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Adams did not show he was entitled to additional time to file his § 2255 motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-03-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7724

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Jerome Adams appealed the district court's denial of his motion for an extension of time to file a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Adams did not show he was entitled to additional time to file his § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Adams, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Jerome Adams appealed the district court's denial of his motion for an extension of time to file a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Adams did not show he was entitled to additional time to file his § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7724

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CHARLES JEROME ADAMS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District
    Judge. (CR-91-291, CA-98-201-1-MC-6)

    Submitted:

    March 11, 1999

    Decided:

    March 18, 1999

    Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles Jerome Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Jerome Adams appeals the district courts order denying his motion for extension of time to file his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255
    (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion.

    We have reviewed the record and

    the district courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v.

    Adams, Nos. CR-91-291; CA-98-201-1-MC-6 (D.S.C. Nov. 4, 1998).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like