Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Wright v. Fahey, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Anthony G. Wright in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Chairwoman of the Virginia Parole Board and the Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Wright's complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Wright v. Fahey, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Anthony G. Wright in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Chairwoman of the Virginia Parole Board and the Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Wright's complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-12-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7192

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Anthony G. Wright in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Chairwoman of the Virginia Parole Board and the Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Wright's complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Wright v. Fahey, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Anthony G. Wright in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Chairwoman of the Virginia Parole Board and the Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Wright's complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7192

    ANTHONY G. WRIGHT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole
    Board; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-05-81-1)

    Submitted:

    November 22, 2005

    Decided:

    December 7, 2005

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony G. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE


    OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony G. Wright appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Wright v.

    Fahey, No. CA-05-81-1 (E.D. Va. July 6, 2005).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like