Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Tyrone A. Williams v. Maryland Parole Commission, 848 F.2d 187, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's refusal to grant habeas corpus relief to Tyrone Williams under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 in his appeal against the Maryland Parole Commission. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Tyrone A. Williams v. Maryland Parole Commission, 848 F.2d 187, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's refusal to grant habeas corpus relief to Tyrone Williams under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 in his appeal against the Maryland Parole Commission. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-05-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 848 F.2d 187 Docket: 88-7561

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's refusal to grant habeas corpus relief to Tyrone Williams under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 in his appeal against the Maryland Parole Commission. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Tyrone A. Williams v. Maryland Parole Commission, 848 F.2d 187, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's refusal to grant habeas corpus relief to Tyrone Williams under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 in his appeal against the Maryland Parole Commission. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the district court's reasoning for denying relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    848 F.

    2d 187
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Tyrone A. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, RespondentAppellee.
    No. 88-7561.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: March 29, 1988.
    Decided: May 16, 1988.

    Tyrone A. Williams, appellant pro se.


    Karen Stakem Hornig, Ronald Mark Levitan, Office of the Attorney
    General, for appellee.
    Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
    magistrate's recommendation discloses that this appeal from its order refusing
    habeas corpus relief* pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 is without merit. We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are
    adequately developed in the record and because argument would not
    significantly aid our resolution of the issues presented. The judgment below is
    affirmed on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Maryland Parole
    Commission, C/A No. 87-1572-HM (D.Md. Feb. 4, 1988).
    AFFIRMED.

    2
    *

    Our determination of the merits of this appeal is unaffected by the


    characterization of the suit as a habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254
    or a civil rights suit brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Appellant is not
    entitled to relief under either statute. Failure to demonstrate exhaustion of state
    remedies in the district court does not necessitate remand. See Granberry v.
    Greer, 55 U.S.L.W. 4494, 4496 (U.S. Apr. 21, 1987) (No. 85-6790)

    You might also like