Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Anderson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Kenneth Anderson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's June 20, 1996 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Anderson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Kenneth Anderson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's June 20, 1996 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7058

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Kenneth Anderson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's June 20, 1996 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Anderson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Kenneth Anderson appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's June 20, 1996 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7058

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    KENNETH LEE ANDERSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-90-74, CA-96-194-3-P)
    Submitted:

    March 13, 1997

    Decided:

    March 18, 1997

    Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Aaron Edmund Michel, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.
    C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kenneth Anderson seeks to appeal the district court's order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994), amended by
    Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
    104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Anderson, Nos.
    CR-90-74; CA-96-194-3-P (W.D.N.C. June 20, 1996). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like