Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hurley v. P.F.Z. Properties, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Anthony Hurley appealed a district court's order that dismissed his claim against Defendants P.F.Z. Properties and Jack Katz and denied his subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that dismissed Hurley's claim and denied his motion to alter the judgment. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-02-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-2189

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Anthony Hurley appealed a district court's order that dismissed his claim against Defendants P.F.Z. Properties and Jack Katz and denied his subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that dismissed Hurley's claim and denied his motion to alter the judgment. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Hurley v. P.F.Z. Properties, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Anthony Hurley appealed a district court's order that dismissed his claim against Defendants P.F.Z. Properties and Jack Katz and denied his subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that dismissed Hurley's claim and denied his motion to alter the judgment. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-2189

    ANTHONY E. HURLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    P.F.Z. PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; JACK KATZ,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-04-1545-WDQ)

    Submitted:

    January 28, 2005

    Decided:

    February 18, 2005

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony E. Hurley, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth C. Honeywell, Jason


    Thomas Sayers, VENABLE, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony E. Hurley appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his claim against Defendants and denying his subsequent
    Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment in this civil action.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Hurley v.

    P.F.Z. Prop., Inc., No. CA-04-1545-WDQ (D. Md. filed June 30, 2004
    & entered July 1, 2004; Aug. 3, 2004; Aug. 17, 2004).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like