Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Valdosta Livestock Company v. Jacob C. Williams and Bank of Washington, Washington, North Carolina, 316 F.2d 188, 4th Cir. (1963)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling dismissing an appeal from a lower court's denial of a motion for summary judgment. The court found that the lower court's order was interlocutory (not final) and therefore not appealable, as there were genuine disputes of material facts that needed to be resolved at trial. In less than 3 sentences, it summarizes the case name and court, states the type of ruling appealed, and gives the reason for dismissal of the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Valdosta Livestock Company v. Jacob C. Williams and Bank of Washington, Washington, North Carolina, 316 F.2d 188, 4th Cir. (1963)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    This document is a court ruling dismissing an appeal from a lower court's denial of a motion for summary judgment. The court found that the lower court's order was interlocutory (not final) and therefore not appealable, as there were genuine disputes of material facts that needed to be resolved at trial. In less than 3 sentences, it summarizes the case name and court, states the type of ruling appealed, and gives the reason for dismissal of the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1963-04-08 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 316 F.2d 188 Docket: 8905_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling dismissing an appeal from a lower court's denial of a motion for summary judgment. The court found that the lower court's order was interlocutory (not final) and therefore not appealable, as there were genuine disputes of material facts that needed to be resolved at trial. In less than 3 sentences, it summarizes the case name and court, states the type of ruling appealed, and gives the reason for dismissal of the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views1 page

    Valdosta Livestock Company v. Jacob C. Williams and Bank of Washington, Washington, North Carolina, 316 F.2d 188, 4th Cir. (1963)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling dismissing an appeal from a lower court's denial of a motion for summary judgment. The court found that the lower court's order was interlocutory (not final) and therefore not appealable, as there were genuine disputes of material facts that needed to be resolved at trial. In less than 3 sentences, it summarizes the case name and court, states the type of ruling appealed, and gives the reason for dismissal of the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    316 F.

    2d 188

    VALDOSTA LIVESTOCK COMPANY, Appellant,


    v.
    Jacob C. WILLIAMS and Bank of Washington, Washington,
    North Carolina, Appellees.
    No. 8905.

    United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.


    Argued April 4, 1963.
    Decided April 8, 1963.

    Ed G. Barham, Valdosta, Ga., and Bryan Grimes, Washington, N. C.


    (Franklin, Barham, Coleman, Elliott & Blackburn, Valdosta, Ga., on the
    brief), for appellant.
    John C. Rodman, Washington, N. C. (Rodman & Rodman, Washington,
    N. C., on the brief) for appellee, Bank of Washington, Washington, North
    Carolina.
    Before BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and HARRY E.
    WATKINS, District Judge.
    PER CURIAM.

    Appellant seeks to prosecute an appeal from an order of the District Court


    denying its motion for summary judgment on the ground that there were
    genuine issues as to material facts which should be tried by jury. The order is
    interlocutory and is, therefore, unappealable. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v.
    United States, 149 F.2d 130 (2d Cir., 1945); Burleson v. Canada, 285 F.2d 264
    (4th Cir., 1961).

    Appeal dismissed.

    You might also like