Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Lora, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appealed the district court's denial of his motions for a copy of a government witness's presentence report, for reconsideration of that denial, and for recusal of the district court judge. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its opinions. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-09-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6448

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appealed the district court's denial of his motions for a copy of a government witness's presentence report, for reconsideration of that denial, and for recusal of the district court judge. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its opinions. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Lora, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appealed the district court's denial of his motions for a copy of a government witness's presentence report, for reconsideration of that denial, and for recusal of the district court judge. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its opinions. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6448

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (CR-98-358-A)

    Submitted:

    August 28, 2003

    Decided:

    September 4, 2003

    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district courts orders
    denying his motions for a copy of a government witness presentence
    report, for reconsideration, and for recusal of the district court
    judge.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinions and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v.

    Lora, No. CR-98-358-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 2, 2002; Feb. 4, 2003).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like