Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Darden v. United States, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Frederick Darden appealed the district court's dismissal of his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's ruling, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments. The appeals court agreed with the district court's dismissal of Darden's complaint for the reasons stated in its August 24, 2007 decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-12-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1867

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frederick Darden appealed the district court's dismissal of his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's ruling, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments. The appeals court agreed with the district court's dismissal of Darden's complaint for the reasons stated in its August 24, 2007 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Darden v. United States, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frederick Darden appealed the district court's dismissal of his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's ruling, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments. The appeals court agreed with the district court's dismissal of Darden's complaint for the reasons stated in its August 24, 2007 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1867

    FREDERICK DARDEN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:07-cv-00428-REP)

    Submitted:

    December 13, 2007

    Decided:

    December 18, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Frederick Darden, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Frederick

    Darden

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. We have reviewed


    the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Darden v. United

    States,

    24,

    No.

    3:07-cv-00428-REP

    (E.D.

    Va.

    Aug.

    2007).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like