Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    United States of America for the Use and Benefit of R. E. Lee Electric Company, Inc. v. Clifford W. Stack T/a C. W. Stack Company and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 420 F.2d 698, 4th Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's opinion in a case where R.E. Lee Electric Company sued Clifford W. Stack and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company to recover unpaid costs for electrical work performed under a government contract. The appellate court adopted the district court's opinion as its own without further comment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States of America for the Use and Benefit of R. E. Lee Electric Company, Inc. v. Clifford W. Stack T/a C. W. Stack Company and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 420 F.2d 698, 4th Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's opinion in a case where R.E. Lee Electric Company sued Clifford W. Stack and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company to recover unpaid costs for electrical work performed under a government contract. The appellate court adopted the district court's opinion as its own without further comment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1970-01-12 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 420 F.2d 698 Docket: 13460_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's opinion in a case where R.E. Lee Electric Company sued Clifford W. Stack and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company to recover unpaid costs for electrical work performed under a government contract. The appellate court adopted the district court's opinion as its own without further comment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views1 page

    United States of America for the Use and Benefit of R. E. Lee Electric Company, Inc. v. Clifford W. Stack T/a C. W. Stack Company and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 420 F.2d 698, 4th Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's opinion in a case where R.E. Lee Electric Company sued Clifford W. Stack and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company to recover unpaid costs for electrical work performed under a government contract. The appellate court adopted the district court's opinion as its own without further comment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    420 F.

    2d 698

    UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of R. E.


    LEE ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc., Appellee,
    v.
    Clifford W. STACK t/a C. W. Stack Company and Hartford
    Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellants.
    No. 13460.

    United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.


    Argued Jan. 7, 1970.
    Decided Jan. 12, 1970.

    Frank L. Cowles, Jr., and Kennon W. Bryan, Fairfax, Va. (Swayze, Parris,
    Cowles & Tydings, Fairfax, Va., on the brief), for appellants.
    Anthony S. Gallucio, Arlington, Va. (Shaffer, VanMeter & Gallucio,
    Arlington, Va., on the brief), for appellee.
    Before BOREMAN, WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Upon consideration of the record, the briefs, and arguments of counsel we


    affirm upon the opinion of the district court.1

    Affirmed.

    308 F.Supp. 46 (E.D.Va.1968)

    You might also like