Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Darryl El v. Max Daetwyler Corporation, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Darryl El's Title VII employment discrimination lawsuit against Max Daetwyler Corporation and two individuals. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court also declined to hold oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-10-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1555

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Darryl El's Title VII employment discrimination lawsuit against Max Daetwyler Corporation and two individuals. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court also declined to hold oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Darryl El v. Max Daetwyler Corporation, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Darryl El's Title VII employment discrimination lawsuit against Max Daetwyler Corporation and two individuals. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appellate court also declined to hold oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1555

    DARRYL EL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MAX
    DAETWYLER
    SIEGENTHALER,

    CORPORATION;

    DON

    BERGHOLZ;

    WALTER

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
    District Judge. (3:09-cv-00415-MOC-DCK)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2011

    Decided:

    October 20, 2011

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Darryl El, Appellant Pro Se.


    Thomas Pearson Holderness,
    ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Darryl

    El

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights
    Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. 2000e to 2000e-17 (West
    2003 & Supp. 2011).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    El v. Max Daetwyler Corp., No. 3:09-cv-

    00415-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2011).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like