Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Butts v. Jamaludeen, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Wayne Douglas Butts filed a § 1983 complaint against Dr. Jamaludeen which was denied by the district court. Butts appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-01-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7398

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Wayne Douglas Butts filed a § 1983 complaint against Dr. Jamaludeen which was denied by the district court. Butts appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Butts v. Jamaludeen, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wayne Douglas Butts filed a § 1983 complaint against Dr. Jamaludeen which was denied by the district court. Butts appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7398

    WAYNE DOUGLAS BUTTS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR JAMALUDEEN,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CA-04-424)

    Submitted:

    December 21, 2005

    Decided:

    January 18, 2006

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wayne Douglas Butts, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, RAWLS
    & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Wayne Douglas Butts seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See


    Butts v. Jamaludeen, No. CA-04-424 (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2005).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like