Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In Re: Kenneth W. Stine, Debtor, Kenneth W. Stine v. Nationsbank, 360 F.3d 455, 4th Cir. (2004)
In Re: Kenneth W. Stine, Debtor, Kenneth W. Stine v. Nationsbank, 360 F.3d 455, 4th Cir. (2004)
3d 455
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-99-3678-JFM; BK98-8051-6-FSD; AP-99-5417)
ARGUED: Ronald Scott Canter, Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P., Bethesda,
Maryland, for Appellant.
Mark Franklin Scurti, Mark F. Scurti, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
ON BRIEF: Robert Neil Grossbart, David A. Rosenberg, Robert N.
Grossbart, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and Cynthia Holcomb
HALL, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Affirmed by published PER CURIAM opinion.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The order of the district court appealed from is described in Bank of America
N.A. (USA) v. Stine, 252 B.R. 902 (D.Md.2000), and the case was referred by
us to the Court of Appeals of Maryland, which certification order is under the
style of: In re: Stine//Kenneth W. Stine v. NationsBank, No. 00-2352 (4th
Cir.2001).
2
The Court of Appeals of Maryland answered our question and filed its opinion
under the style of: Bank of America, f/k/a NationsBank v. Kenneth W. Stine, 379
Md. 76, 839 A.2d 727 (2003).
The Court of Appeals of Maryland answered that question "in the affirmative."
839 A.2d at 740.
The order of the district court appealed from is accordingly affirmed on the
opinion of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, which we adopt as our own.
AFFIRMED