Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • John Fishback v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which John William Fishback appealed the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various parties. The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appeals court also denied Fishback's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6666

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which John William Fishback appealed the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various parties. The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appeals court also denied Fishback's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    John Fishback v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which John William Fishback appealed the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various parties. The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appeals court also denied Fishback's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6666

    JOHN WILLIAM FISHBACK,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF MARYLAND; CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY;
    MARYLAND COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS; CITY OF BALTIMORE; DANIEL
    H. GINSBURG; BENNETT & BAIR; ARTHUR M. FRANK; FRANK M.
    CONAWAY; LESLIE D. GRADET; GARI BAIR; EMANUEL BROWN; ALLEN
    L. SCHWARTZ; TWILLA DRIGGINS; PATRICIA C. JESSEMY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
    Judge. (1:12-cv-00927-JFM)

    Submitted:

    October 2, 2012

    Decided:

    November 5, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John William Fishback, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    John

    William

    Fishback

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28


    U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    reasons stated by the district court.

    for

    appointment

    of

    counsel.

    affirm

    for

    the

    See Fishback v. Maryland,

    No. 1:12-cv-00927-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 4, 2012).


    motion

    we

    We

    We deny Fishbacks
    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like