Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Brooks v. Culligan, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Stephan Brooks filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against police officers W. T. Culligan and J. W. Booth and the Charlotte Police Department. The district court denied relief and Brooks appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without requiring oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-12-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7079

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stephan Brooks filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against police officers W. T. Culligan and J. W. Booth and the Charlotte Police Department. The district court denied relief and Brooks appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without requiring oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Brooks v. Culligan, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stephan Brooks filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against police officers W. T. Culligan and J. W. Booth and the Charlotte Police Department. The district court denied relief and Brooks appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without requiring oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7079

    STEPHAN D. BROOKS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    W. T. CULLIGAN; J. W. BOOTH,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    CHARLOTTE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-99-64-3-2MU)

    Submitted:

    November 30, 2000

    Decided:

    December 11, 2000

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Stephan D. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Bayard Aycock, III,
    Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Stephan D. Brooks appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

    the district court.

    See Brooks v. Culligan, No. CA-99-64-3-2MU

    (W.D.N.C. filed June 21, 2000; entered June 27, 2000). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like