Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Daniel Willis v. Town of Trenton, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views3 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Daniel Johnson Willis appealed a district court's denial of authorization to file a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Town of Trenton and other defendants. Willis was subject to a pre-filing injunction requiring court approval before filing new complaints. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying authorization. As a result, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-10-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1863

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Daniel Johnson Willis appealed a district court's denial of authorization to file a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Town of Trenton and other defendants. Willis was subject to a pre-filing injunction requiring court approval before filing new complaints. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying authorization. As a result, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views3 pages

    Daniel Willis v. Town of Trenton, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Daniel Johnson Willis appealed a district court's denial of authorization to file a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Town of Trenton and other defendants. Willis was subject to a pre-filing injunction requiring court approval before filing new complaints. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasons for denying authorization. As a result, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1863

    DANIEL J. WILLIS,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    TOWN OF TRENTON AND ITS OFFICIALS; MAYOR DARLENE SPIVEY;
    DANNY BLACKWELL; ROBERT HORVATH; CHARLES C. JONES, JR.,
    Council Member; GLENN SPIVEY, Town clerk and Jones County
    School
    Board
    and
    its
    members;
    MICHAEL
    BRACEY,
    Superintendent; BILLY GRIFFIN; CHARLES GRAY; MARY HALL;
    BARRY JONES; LARRY WALSTON; LUVENIA FOSTER, Administrative
    Assistant and Liaison Officer as Board Members; JONES
    COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS; FRANKY HOWARD, County
    Manager; FRANK EMORY, Chairman; W. MICHAEL HADDOCK; SONDRA
    RIGGS; JOSEPH WIGGINS; ZACK KOONCE, III, Commissioner;
    JENNIFER KING, Clerk to the Board, and/or their Successors,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Greenville.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (4:13-mc-00004-H)

    Submitted:

    October 22, 2013

    Decided:

    October 24, 2013

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Tanner


    Kennedy, THARRINGTON SMITH LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Daniel

    Johnson

    Willis

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying authorization to file his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006)


    complaint.

    Willis is required to file a motion for leave to

    file a complaint under a pre-filing injunction imposed by this


    court and the district court.
    find

    no

    reasons

    reversible
    stated

    Trenton,

    No.

    dispense

    with

    contentions

    by

    error.
    the

    Accordingly,

    district

    4:13-mc-00004-H

    are

    oral

    We have reviewed the record and

    argument

    adequately

    we

    court.

    (E.D.N.C.
    because

    presented

    in

    affirm

    Willis
    June
    the
    the

    v.

    for

    the

    Town

    of

    18,

    2013).

    We

    facts

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like