Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    United States v. Parrish, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Parrish appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny Parrish's motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision without requiring oral argument, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Parrish, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    John Parrish appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny Parrish's motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision without requiring oral argument, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-03-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7598

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John Parrish appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny Parrish's motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision without requiring oral argument, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Parrish, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Parrish appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny Parrish's motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision without requiring oral argument, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7598

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JOHN F. PARRISH, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-96-124, CA-98-298-2)

    Submitted:

    March 9, 1999

    Decided:

    March 22, 1999

    Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    John F. Parrish, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John F. Parrish, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    and Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate


    judge and find no reversible error.
    reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the


    See United States v. Parrish,

    Nos. CR-96-124; CA-98-298-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 26, 1998).

    We dis-

    pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like