Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Garland v. Catoe, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-judge panel decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Ahmad Clarence Garland's § 1983 complaint. The panel found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Garland v. Catoe, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-judge panel decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Ahmad Clarence Garland's § 1983 complaint. The panel found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-03-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-8006

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-judge panel decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Ahmad Clarence Garland's § 1983 complaint. The panel found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Garland v. Catoe, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-judge panel decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Ahmad Clarence Garland's § 1983 complaint. The panel found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The panel dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-8006

    AHMAD CLARENCE GARLAND,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director, South Carolina
    Department of Corrections; C. RUSHTON, Warden,
    McCormick
    Correctional
    Institution;
    L.
    CARTLEDGE,
    Associate
    Warden,
    McCormick
    Correctional
    Institution;
    C.
    KENDALL,
    Associate
    Warden,
    McCormick
    Correctional
    Institution;
    S.
    LEWIS,
    Major,
    McCormick
    Correctional Institution; I. CULBREATH, Inmate
    Grievance Counselor, McCormick Correctional
    Institution;
    GEORGE
    LONG,
    McCormick
    Correctional Institution; J. REED, McCormick
    Correctional Institution; RICHARD P. STROKES,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    PHILIP MORRIS, USA,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
    (CA-00-3024-4-19BF)

    Submitted:

    March 21, 2002

    Decided:

    March 28, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ahmad Clarence Garland, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,


    MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ahmad Clarence Garland appeals the district courts order
    denying

    relief

    complaint.

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.A.

    1983

    (West

    Supp.

    2001)

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion accepting the magistrate judges recommendation and find no


    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court.

    See Garland v. Catoe, No. CA-00-3024-4-19BF

    (D.S.C. Nov. 7, 2001).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like