Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Fowler v. City of Raleigh Park, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Fowler filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department and several individuals. The district court dismissed Fowler's lawsuit and he appealed. The appellate court reviewed the case and affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the lawsuit, finding no reversible errors. The appellate court relied on the reasoning of the district court and did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Fowler v. City of Raleigh Park, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Michael Fowler filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department and several individuals. The district court dismissed Fowler's lawsuit and he appealed. The appellate court reviewed the case and affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the lawsuit, finding no reversible errors. The appellate court relied on the reasoning of the district court and did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-12-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-2323

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Fowler filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department and several individuals. The district court dismissed Fowler's lawsuit and he appealed. The appellate court reviewed the case and affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the lawsuit, finding no reversible errors. The appellate court relied on the reasoning of the district court and did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Fowler v. City of Raleigh Park, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Fowler filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department and several individuals. The district court dismissed Fowler's lawsuit and he appealed. The appellate court reviewed the case and affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the lawsuit, finding no reversible errors. The appellate court relied on the reasoning of the district court and did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-2323

    MICHAEL A. FOWLER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT; GENE TOMLINSON; DANNY F. MORGAN; STANLEY
    K. MARSHBURN; JERRY M. HOBBY; ALLEN B. HALL,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-351-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 1998

    Decided:

    December 30, 1998

    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael A. Fowler, Appellant Pro Se. Dorothy K. Woodward, CITY OF
    RALEIGH, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael A. Fowler appeals the district courts order dismissing his employment discrimination action.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible


    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court. See Fowler v. City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department, No. CA-98-351-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 1998). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like