Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Belin v. McCutheon, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Earl Belin filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Deputy Sheriff B. McCutheon. The district court denied Belin relief and Belin appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. Belin's appeal was denied and the motion to dismiss the appeal was also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Belin v. McCutheon, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Earl Belin filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Deputy Sheriff B. McCutheon. The district court denied Belin relief and Belin appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. Belin's appeal was denied and the motion to dismiss the appeal was also denied.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-06-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-1630

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Earl Belin filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Deputy Sheriff B. McCutheon. The district court denied Belin relief and Belin appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. Belin's appeal was denied and the motion to dismiss the appeal was also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Belin v. McCutheon, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Earl Belin filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Deputy Sheriff B. McCutheon. The district court denied Belin relief and Belin appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. Belin's appeal was denied and the motion to dismiss the appeal was also denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-1630

    EARL BELIN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    B. MCCUTHEON, individually and in his capacity
    as deputy sheriff of Florence County,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
    (CA-01-4336-4-25)

    Submitted:

    March 26, 2004

    Decided:

    June 14, 2004

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    R. Edward Hemingway, THE HEMINGWAY LAW FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South


    Carolina, for Appellant.
    Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX, BUYCK &
    WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Earl Belin appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

    the district court.

    See Belin v. McCutheon, No. CA-01-4336-4-25

    (D.S.C. May 16, 2003).

    Appellees motion to dismiss the appeal is

    denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like