Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Taylor v. Barnhart, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    1) Wayne Taylor appealed a magistrate judge's order denying his motion for summary judgment and granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment on Taylor's claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. 2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-04-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1817

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Wayne Taylor appealed a magistrate judge's order denying his motion for summary judgment and granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment on Taylor's claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. 2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Taylor v. Barnhart, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Wayne Taylor appealed a magistrate judge's order denying his motion for summary judgment and granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment on Taylor's claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. 2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1817

    WAYNE TAYLOR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville.
    Dennis L. Howell,
    Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00282-DLH)

    Submitted:

    April 4, 2008

    Decided:

    April 16, 2008

    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    V. Lamar
    Carolina,
    Attorney,
    Robert J.
    Assistant
    Appellee.

    Gudger, III, GUDGER & GUDGER, P.A., Asheville, North


    for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States
    Sidney P. Alexander, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Triba, Chief Regional Counsel, Dino Trubiano, Special
    United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wayne
    denying

    his

    Commissioners

    Taylor

    motion
    motion

    appeals

    for

    the

    for

    summary
    summary

    magistrate

    judgment

    and

    judgment

    on

    judges*

    order

    granting
    his

    claim

    the
    for

    disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income


    under the Social Security Act.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the magistrate judge.

    See Taylor v. Barnhart, No. 1:06-

    cv-00282-DLH (W.D.N.C. June 27, 2007).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate


    judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) (2000).
    - 2 -

    You might also like