Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Flores, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Edwin Flores appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated, that Flores did not qualify for a sentence reduction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-01-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7286

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Edwin Flores appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated, that Flores did not qualify for a sentence reduction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Flores, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Edwin Flores appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated, that Flores did not qualify for a sentence reduction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7286

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    EDWIN FLORES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
    District Judge. (1:06-cr-00292-JCC-5)

    Submitted:

    January 15, 2009

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    SHEDD,

    Circuit

    Decided:

    Judges,

    and

    January 22, 2009

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edwin Flores, Appellant Pro Se.


    Jonathan Leo Fahey, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Edwin
    denying
    3582(c)

    his

    Flores

    motion

    (2006).

    reversible error.

    appeals

    for
    We

    the

    reduction

    have

    reviewed

    district
    of

    courts

    sentence,

    the

    record

    18
    and

    order
    U.S.C.

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Flores, No. 1:06-cr-

    00292-JCC-5 (E.D. Va. July 2, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like