Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding John Williams, Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. It also denied Williams' motion to appoint counsel and waived oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding John Williams, Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. It also denied Williams' motion to appoint counsel and waived oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-04-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7266

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding John Williams, Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. It also denied Williams' motion to appoint counsel and waived oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding John Williams, Jr.'s appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. It also denied Williams' motion to appoint counsel and waived oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7266

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOHN WILLIAMS, JR., a/k/a Cecil,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (5:04-cr-00322-FL-1)

    Submitted:

    April 13, 2010

    Decided:

    April 21, 2010

    Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes,


    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    John Williams, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
    3582(c)

    (2006).

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by

    court.

    the

    district

    United

    States

    5:04-cr-00322-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2009).


    motion

    to

    appoint

    counsel

    and

    dispense

    v.

    Williams,

    No.

    We deny Williams
    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like