Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Bramwell, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Carol Bramwell appealed the district court's denial of her motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) and 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-10-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6999

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carol Bramwell appealed the district court's denial of her motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) and 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Bramwell, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carol Bramwell appealed the district court's denial of her motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) and 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials and oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6999

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CAROL BRAMWELL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-91-429)

    Submitted:

    October 21, 1999

    Decided:

    October 27, 1999

    Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Carol Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Carol Bramwell appeals the district courts order denying her
    motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3553(b) (1994) and 18 U.S.C.A.
    3582 (West 1985 & Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and

    the district courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United
    States v. Bramwell, No. CR-91-429 (E.D. Va. June 2, 1999).

    We dis-

    pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like