Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Missouri v. United States, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vincent Missouri appealed the district court's denial of his Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Missouri v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-03269-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2010). The Fourth Circuit also denied Missouri's request to waive the appellate filing fee to amend his complaint. Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Missouri v. United States, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views3 pages
    Vincent Missouri appealed the district court's denial of his Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Missouri v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-03269-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2010). The Fourth Circuit also denied Missouri's request to waive the appellate filing fee to amend his complaint. Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-11-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6630

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Vincent Missouri appealed the district court's denial of his Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Missouri v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-03269-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2010). The Fourth Circuit also denied Missouri's request to waive the appellate filing fee to amend his complaint. Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views3 pages

    Missouri v. United States, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vincent Missouri appealed the district court's denial of his Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Missouri v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-03269-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2010). The Fourth Circuit also denied Missouri's request to waive the appellate filing fee to amend his complaint. Oral argument was dispensed with because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6630

    VINCENT MISSOURI,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; MARK C. MOORE; DEBORAH B.
    BARBIER, Assistant US Attorney; UNITED STATES PROBATION
    DEPARTMENT; DICKIE BRUNSON, Chief US Probation Officer;
    MYRA E. BAILEY, Supervising US Probation Officer; EARL
    GILLAM, US Probation Officer; US FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS
    OFFICE;
    UNITED
    STATES
    MARSHALL
    SERVICE,
    Greenville
    Division; GREENVILLE SOUTH CAROLINA SHERIFFS OFFICE, STATE
    OF; JUSTIN HUGHES, Officer, all Defendants officially and
    individually; HONORABLE MARGARET B. SEYMOUR; US BUREAU OF
    PRISONS; UNICOR PRISON INDUSTRY; DAVID PLOWDEN; CATHERINE
    E.
    EVATT;
    UNITED
    STATES
    MARSHALS
    SERVICE,
    Columbia
    Division,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (2:09-cv-03269-CMC)

    Submitted:

    November 10, 2010

    Before WILKINSON and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    GREGORY,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    November 23, 2010

    Judges,

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Vincent Missouri, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Vincent
    denying

    his

    Missouri

    Federal

    Rule

    alter or amend judgment.


    no reversible error.

    appeals
    of

    Civil

    district

    Procedure

    courts

    59(e)

    order

    motion

    to

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons


    Missouri v. United States, No.

    stated by the district court.


    2:09-cv-03269-CMC

    the

    (D.S.C.

    Apr.

    30,

    2010).

    To

    the

    extent

    Missouri requests in his informal brief to waive the appellate


    case

    filing

    requests.
    legal
    before

    fee

    to

    amend

    his

    complaint,

    we

    deny

    those

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    and

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like