Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kubweza v. US Postal Service, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's decision to dismiss Lindiwe Kubweza's civil action against the United States Postal Service. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's reasoning for dismissing the case. The parties had consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-04-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-1099

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's decision to dismiss Lindiwe Kubweza's civil action against the United States Postal Service. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's reasoning for dismissing the case. The parties had consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    Kubweza v. US Postal Service, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's decision to dismiss Lindiwe Kubweza's civil action against the United States Postal Service. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's reasoning for dismissing the case. The parties had consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-1099

    LINDIWE N. KUBWEZA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
    (CA-98-504-3)

    Submitted:

    April 15, 1999

    Decided:

    April 19, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Lindiwe N. Kubweza, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lindiwe N. Kubweza appeals the magistrate judges order dismissing her civil action.

    We have reviewed the record and the mag-

    istrate judges opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,


    we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.*

    See Kubweza

    v. United States Postal Service, No. CA-98-504-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15,
    1998).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    judge.

    The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate


    See 28 U.S.C.A. 636 (West 1993 & West Supp. 1998).
    2

    You might also like